Laddering Helps You Maximize Your Interest-based
Income over Time
by Shane
Flait, ©2011
Retirees
who have to live off their interest-based income
investments are often a victim of interest rate
swings that can lower their income
significantly. Chasing after high interest rates
without a strategy can often leave them with
less income than they could get with a laddering
strategy. Here’s the situation…
Interest-rate based investments and their
behavior
Interest-based investments come from
certificates of deposit (CDs), bonds, and
annuities. These types of investments tend to be
more secure than stock-based investments. And
that’s what makes them attractive to those who
depend on them for their living expenses.
But
interest rates fluctuate over time; sometimes
rising and then falling. This causes
interest-based earnings – and the income they
supply to people – to also vary. Everyone wants
to lock in their interest-based investment when
rates are high and not have to suffer through
the low interest rate periods with a low income.
Additionally, at whatever the prevailing
interests rates are¸
interest rate-based investments typically offer
their higher rates for longer maturity
investments. It’s always nice to get the highest
of the prevailing rates, but that means being
locked into a longer maturity. That’s a problem
if prevailing rates are low – and especially if
they may be going up soon.
Chasing
a higher interest rate can be a problem
If you
invest all you have when rates are historically
high, that’s great; you’ll earn allot for your
investment before they mature. But when
interest rates are low when you want to invest
because you need the income but you don’t want
to be locked into low rates for a long term
maturity in case interest rates go up.
If you
try to sell out of a long term maturity
investment early to buy into rising rate
investments, you’ll generally pay a stiff
penalty or suffer a loss of principal – as on a
bond. You could buy shorter maturity units to
preserve your ability to buy when rates go up
but that leaves you with even a lower rate than
you could get at that time.
Without
a strategy, you’re forever chasing after a
higher interest rate while getting less than the
best rate at any one time. There is a better
approach. And that’s laddering your investment.
The
Laddering Principle
Laddering
is based on dividing your investment money into
equal parts – three, four, or even up to 10. You
need to work into the situation where each of
these parts is invested at the longest maturity
time to garner the highest prevailing rate when
bought; you hold all to maturity, and each will
mature at successively later times. As each
reaches maturity, you reinvest it again at the
highest prevailing rate.
Under
this circumstance, you’ll still be subject to
changing interest rates, but your time-staggered
investments will smooth out your income
fluctuation and have them arise only from the
highest rates that prevailed when bought.
How do
you begin to implement your laddering strategy?
For CDs
and Bonds, you begin by dividing your full
investment into perhaps 5 equal parts. The
number of parts depends on the amount of money
you have. Invest one part into the longest
maturity investment to get the highest
prevailing interest rate. Invest each remaining
part into an investments with consecutively
shorter time to maturity; you hold all them to
maturity, though. Obviously you’ll get a lower
interest on the shorter times; but that will
change.
Now as
each investment comes to maturity, you’ll
reinvest it into the longest maturity possible.
That’ll get you the highest prevailing rate at
that time. Keep this up, and you’ll have all
your parts invested at the longest maturities
invested at the highest prevailing rates. Now
you’re properly laddered.
Annuities
are handles somewhat analogously. That’s for
another article.
Putting a
bond investment into the Laddering Strategy
A simple
example of preparing a bond investment for
laddering may be helpful. For simplicity, we’ll
you divide your $30,000 ‘income investment’ into
3 parts – refer to the table. Begin your 1st
year by investing each part at a different
‘years-to-maturity’ – not all at the longest
maturity (which gives the highest rate)! These
parts are investments A, B, and C in the table.
(The ‘maturity term’ reflects the term of the
bond).
The 1st
year summary shows the average maturity term is
‘2 years’, the average rate is ‘3.5%, and total
earnings you get on your $30,000. Let’s assume
that rates at each maturity stay the same (i.e.
interest rates don’t change for the while).
At the
beginning of the 2nd year when the
shortest time to maturity occurs, you reinvest
money from A into the longest term bond (highest
rate) as D. The other two bonds’
‘years-to-maturity’ shorten by 1 year. Now see
that the 2nd year summary gives a
longer average maturity, a higher average
interest rate, and an increased annual earnings.
By the 3rd
year, following the same reinvestment procedure,
you’re earnings come from all longest
maturities, at the highest rates, but you still
some short liquidity as 1/3 of your investment
matures each year.
However
rates change you’ll be able to invest in the
‘long term’ rates with your ‘soon to mature’
investment part.
|
Laddering Illustration for Dividing
Investment in Thirds |
|
Investment year |
Investment |
Years-to-maturity |
Maturity term |
Interest rate |
Investment |
Annual earnings |
|
1st year |
A |
1 |
1 |
2.5 |
10,000 |
250 |
|
|
B |
2 |
2 |
3.5 |
10,000 |
350 |
|
|
C |
3 |
3 |
4.5 |
10,000 |
450 |
|
1st Year summary |
3 equal investments |
1 year
Shortest time to liquidity |
2 is
Average maturity |
3.5 is average rate |
30,000 is total investment |
1050 is total earnings |
|
2nd year |
B |
1 |
2 |
3.5 |
10,000 |
350 |
|
|
C |
2 |
3 |
4.5 |
10,000 |
450 |
|
|
D |
3 |
3 |
4.5 |
10,000 |
450 |
|
2nd Year summary |
3 equal investments |
1 year
Shortest time to liquidity |
2 2/3 is average maturity |
4.17 is average rate |
30,000 is total investment |
1250 is total earnings |
|
3rd year |
C |
1 |
3 |
4.5 |
10,000 |
450 |
|
|
D |
2 |
3 |
4.5 |
10,000 |
450 |
|
|
E |
3 |
3 |
4.5 |
10,000 |
450 |
|
3rd Year summary |
3 equal investments |
1 year
Shortest time to liquidity |
3 is average maturity |
4.5 is average rate |
30,000 is total investment |
1350 is total earnings |